data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f704/2f704f9aa9daf54ccddb9bda0617c4334f4c6d5c" alt=""
Signature gatherers for Prop. 139 take a selfie in front of boxes of signature petition sheets in Phoenix, Ariz. on July 3, 2024. The Arizona for Abortion Access campaign gathered more than 823,000 signatures to qualify for the 2024 ballot, more than double the number needed. Photo by Gloria Rebecca Gomez | Arizona Mirror
Arizona made abortion a constitutionally protected right, in a move that sends a strong rebuke to the state’s GOP legislative majority, most of which backed a near-total ban earlier this year.
Support for Proposition 139, the Arizona Abortion Access Act, overwhelmingly outweighs opposition. With about half of expected ballots counted, 63% of Arizonans voted in favor of the initiative compared to 37% who voted to defeat it. The Associated Press officially called the contest shortly after 1 a.m.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
Backers of the campaign to protect abortion rights celebrated the news, calling Arizona an example for anti-abortion politicians to consider.
“Next time the nation wonders how much government interference in reproductive healthcare is acceptable, or what type of arbitrary abortion ban is popular, they can look at Arizona and know the answer is ‘none,’” said Chris Love, the spokeswoman for YES on 139.
Arizona was one of 10 states that had abortion on the ballot this election. As of Tuesday, seven of those initiatives were on track to pass by wide margins. And Florida’s won approval from 57% of voters, but ultimately won’t pass because it didn’t meet a 60% threshold required for constitutional amendments to be ratified.
Victoria Lopez, with the Arizona branch of the American Civil Liberties Union, said the passage of Prop. 139 was a resounding referendum on the anti-abortion stance of the state’s GOP majority.
“For far too long, Arizonans’ have been subject to the whims of extremist politicians seeking to ban abortion completely,” she said. “Today, Arizonans emphatically affirmed that decisions about abortion belong to us.”
The Grand Canyon State is currently under a 15-week gestational ban that includes no exceptions for rape or incest victims. Only abortions performed to prevent a patient’s death or the impairment of a “major bodily function,” are legal beyond the 2022 law’s deadline.
Prop. 139 would enshrine abortion as a fundamental right in the Arizona Constitution, striking down the 2022 law and shielding the procedure from any future restrictions pushed by lawmakers. It would also restore the standard previously upheld in Roe v. Wade, guaranteeing Arizona women’s ability to obtain an abortion until the point of fetal viability. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists estimates fetal viability to be around 23 weeks.
Along with adopting Roe’s gestational standard, the initiative includes an exception that allows abortions to be performed beyond fetal viability if a provider deems one is necessary to preserve a patient’s life, physical or mental health.
A coalition of local reproductive rights groups and progressive organizations drafted the initiative last year to challenge the 15-week law, after a bid to repeal it failed to earn enough signatures in 2022 to qualify for the ballot, due in part to a lack of time. Prop. 139, however, drew widespread support from voters, collecting more than double the number of signatures needed to land on the 2024 ballot.
In April, new attention to the initiative came when the Arizona Supreme Court revived a Civil War-era near-total abortion ban that mandated prison time for doctors. All but 6 of Arizona’s 45 GOP lawmakers resisted a move to repeal the law before it could go into effect.
Along with removing the state’s gestational ban on abortion, the initiative is expected to invalidate other laws that were passed as barriers to abortion access, including a 24 hour waiting period and a mandatory ultrasound. The initiative expressly prohibits the passage or enforcement of any law or policy that denies, restricts or interferes with a woman’s right to obtain an abortion, unless its purpose is to improve or maintain her health. Lawyers for the campaign have said those laws and others would likely need to be contested in court.
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.